Hyundai Lantra 1999 vs Mercedes E class 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 88 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 129 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Mercedes E class is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai Lantra engine produces 48 HP less power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 61 NM less than Mercedes E class. Due to the lower power, Hyundai Lantra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 9.9 | |
|
The Hyundai Lantra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai Lantra consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that by driving the Hyundai Lantra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes E class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Hyundai Lantra) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes CLK, Mercedes SLK | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes E class might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Hyundai Lantra is smaller. Hyundai Lantra is 39 cm shorter than the Mercedes E class, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Lantra is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 600 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1920 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Lantra is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mercedes E class, which means Hyundai Lantra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Mercedes E class has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Lantra has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mercedes E class, so Mercedes E class quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Lantra has
|
Mercedes E klase has
| |