Hyundai Lantra 1995 vs Chrysler Neon 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 139 HP | 115 - 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 182 NM | 152 - 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 16.5 seconds | 8.8 - 11.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 9.9 | 8.0 - 8.5 | |
|
Hyundai Lantra petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Neon. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.37 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Lantra is 6 cm longer than the Chrysler Neon, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Lantra is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 393 litres | 364 litres | |
|
Hyundai Lantra has more luggage capacity. Hyundai Lantra has 29 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Lantra is 0.4 metres less than that of the Chrysler Neon, which means Hyundai Lantra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`655 | ~ 1`610 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai Lantra has
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |