Hyundai Lantra 1998 vs Rover 400 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 139 HP | 86 - 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 182 NM | 127 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 16.5 seconds | 8.5 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 9.7 | 5.3 - 10.2 | |
|
Hyundai Lantra petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Rover 400. On average, Hyundai Lantra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Lantra is 4 cm shorter than the Rover 400, width is practically the same , while the height of Hyundai Lantra is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Lantra is 0.2 metres more than that of the Rover 400. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`200 | ~ 1`684 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Rover 400 has
| |