Hyundai Lantra 1995 vs Skoda Octavia 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Hyundai Lantra is available only with front wheel drive, while Skoda Octavia can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 139 HP | 90 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 182 NM | 145 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 12.9 seconds | 8.6 - 15.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 9.7 | 5.2 - 9.3 | |
|
Hyundai Lantra petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Octavia. On average, Hyundai Lantra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Lantra is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Lantra is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1512 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Lantra is 0.3 metres less than that of the Skoda Octavia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`700 | ~ 1`841 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |