Hyundai Lantra 1999 vs Volvo V40 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 139 HP | 102 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 182 NM | 145 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 16.5 seconds | 7.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 9.7 | 5.4 - 10.4 | |
|
Hyundai Lantra petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Hyundai Lantra equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai Lantra is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai Lantra is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 471 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1421 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai Lantra is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`200 | ~ 1`789 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo V40 has
| |