Honda CR-V 2012 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 40 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Freelander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Freelander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.74 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 7 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1669 litres | no data | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V has 184 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.5 metres more than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |