Honda CR-V 2012 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 90 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, but torque is 10 NM more than Land Rover Freelander. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 9.6 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 420 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XJ, Jaguar XF | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Freelander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.74 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1669 litres | no data | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda CR-V has 184 litres more trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. The Land Rover Freelander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.5 metres more than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |