Honda CR-V 2012 vs Honda CR-V 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V 2012 and Honda CR-V 2010 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Honda CR-V 2012 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V 2012 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V 2010, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V 2012 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V 2012 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V 2010. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V 2012 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2012: Vehicle has automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under normal conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly interacts with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and electric power steering to provide full vehicle control, good traction and maneuverability in all road conditions. Honda CR-V 2010: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is identified (pressure is provided to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work seamlessly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 7 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V 2012 is 5 cm longer than the Honda CR-V 2010, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda CR-V 2012 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 524 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1669 litres | no data | |
|
Honda CR-V 2012 has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V 2012 has 65 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V 2010. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |