Honda CR-V 2012 vs Renault Koleos 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 171 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 226 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Renault Koleos is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 21 HP less power than Renault Koleos, but torque is 124 NM more than Renault Koleos. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 9.9 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 5 cm longer than the Renault Koleos, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1669 litres | 1380 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V has 139 litres more trunk space than the Renault Koleos. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 289 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Koleos. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Koleos is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Koleos scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 800 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Renault Koleos has
| |