Honda CR-V 2012 vs Renault Koleos 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 23 HP less power than Renault Koleos, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Renault Koleos. Despite less power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Koleos gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Koleos might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Renault Koleos engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Koleos 2013 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 5 cm longer than the Renault Koleos, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1669 litres | 1380 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V has 139 litres more trunk space than the Renault Koleos. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 289 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Koleos. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Koleos is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Koleos scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Renault Koleos has
| |