Honda CR-V 2012 vs Land Rover Discovery Sport 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V and Land Rover Discovery Sport have the same engine power, but Honda CR-V torque is 50 NM less than Land Rover Discovery Sport. Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 120 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda CR-V consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery Sport. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Discovery Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Discovery Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Discovery Sport engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Land Rover Discovery Sport 2014 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Discovery Sport 2014 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.72 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1669 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres more than that of the Land Rover Discovery Sport. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`775 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Discovery Sport is better rated in child safety tests. The Land Rover Discovery Sport scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 13 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Land Rover Discovery Sport has
| |