Honda CR-V 2012 vs Ford Kuga 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda CR-V engine produces 13 HP less power than Ford Kuga, but torque is 10 NM more than Ford Kuga. Despite less power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda CR-V consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Honda CR-V 2012 2.2 engine: The Honda N22B diesel is generally considered a successful and durable engine. Its main weak points are connected with the fuel system, emissions components, cold-weather operation, and several intake and exhaust-related parts.
One of the most frequent complaints concerns the injectors. Depending on the version, owners report problems with sensitive piezo injectors, while Bosch injectors themselves are usually ... More about Honda CR-V 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 5 cm longer than the Ford Kuga, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1669 litres | 1568 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V has 133 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 101 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`250 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Honda CR-V has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Kuga, so Honda CR-V quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |