Honda CR-V 2012 vs Ford Kuga 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda CR-V engine produces 10 HP more power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Ford Kuga. Thanks to more power Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda CR-V consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Honda CR-V has 4x4: Vehicle has automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under normal conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly interacts with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and electric power steering to provide full vehicle control, good traction and maneuverability in all road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 5 cm longer than the Ford Kuga, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1669 litres | 1568 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V has 133 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 101 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Honda CR-V has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Kuga, so Honda CR-V quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |