Honda CR-V 2012 vs Audi Q5 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 580 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 95 HP less power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 230 NM less than Audi Q5. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda CR-V consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi Q5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | Used also on Audi A7 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Audi Q5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is smaller, but slightly higher. Honda CR-V is 6 cm shorter than the Audi Q5, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1669 litres | 1560 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda CR-V has 49 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q5. The Audi Q5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 109 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres more than that of the Audi Q5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`470 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Audi Q5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Audi Q5, so Audi Q5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 14 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |