Honda CR-V 2012 vs Audi Q5 2012
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 177 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 9 seconds | |
Audi Q5 is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 27 HP less power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Audi Q5. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
The Honda CR-V is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 120 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda CR-V consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
960 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
770 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
Audi Q5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.57 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
Honda CR-V is smaller, but slightly higher. Honda CR-V is 6 cm shorter than the Audi Q5, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 540 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1669 litres | 1560 litres | |
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda CR-V has 49 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q5. The Audi Q5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 109 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres more than that of the Audi Q5. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`430 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | high | |
Audi Q5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Audi Q5, so Audi Q5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 10 200 | 15 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |