Honda CR-V 2012 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 90 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 8.5 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is smaller. Honda CR-V is 7 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1669 litres | 1455 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda CR-V has 94 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 214 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Volvo XC60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volvo XC60, so Volvo XC60 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 800 | 16 000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |