Honda CR-V 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 50 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 8.5 | |
| Honda CR-V consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Honda CR-V has 4x4: Vehicle has automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under normal conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly interacts with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and electric power steering to provide full vehicle control, good traction and maneuverability in all road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is smaller. Honda CR-V is 9 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1669 litres | 1455 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda CR-V has 94 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 214 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Volvo XC60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volvo XC60, so Volvo XC60 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 15 400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |