Honda CR-V 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V 2013 is more dynamic to drive. Honda CR-V 2013 engine produces 24 HP more power than Honda CR-V 2010, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Honda CR-V 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 9.5 | |
|
The Honda CR-V 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V 2013 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V 2010, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V 2013 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2012: Vehicle has automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under normal conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly interacts with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and electric power steering to provide full vehicle control, good traction and maneuverability in all road conditions. Honda CR-V 2010: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is identified (pressure is provided to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work seamlessly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V 2010 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 15 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V 2010 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V 2013 is 2 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V 2010, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda CR-V 2013 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1669 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 12 800 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |