Honda CR-V 2013 vs Kia Sportage 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda CR-V engine produces 40 HP more power than Kia Sportage, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Kia Sportage. Thanks to more power Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 8.5 | |
| Honda CR-V consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai i40, Hyundai ix35, Kia Carens | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Sportage might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Kia Sportage engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.63 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 11 cm longer than the Kia Sportage, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 564 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1669 litres | no data | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V has 25 litres more trunk space than the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 1 metres more than that of the Kia Sportage, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Kia Sportage is better rated in child safety tests. The Kia Sportage scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Sportage has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |