Honda CR-V 2010 vs Volvo XC60 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 166 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 37 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 8.5 | |
|
The Volvo XC60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Honda CR-V has 4x4: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is identified (pressure is provided to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work seamlessly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 1 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo V60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is smaller. Honda CR-V is 6 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC60 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |