Honda CR-V 2010 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 166 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 226 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 8 HP less power than Hyundai Santa FE, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Hyundai Santa FE. Despite less power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 8.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 105 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda CR-V consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Santa FE. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Santa FE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hyundai Santa FE 2010 2.4 engine: Generally reliable and easy to maintain engine, with spare parts available. The engine is not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Although the manufacturer does not specify a chain change interval, it ... More about Hyundai Santa FE 2010 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is smaller. Honda CR-V is 9 cm shorter than the Hyundai Santa FE, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 528 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Santa FE has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |