Honda CR-V 2010 vs Mazda CX-7 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 23 HP less power than Mazda CX-7, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Mazda CX-7. Despite less power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 69 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda CX-7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Honda CR-V has 4x4: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is identified (pressure is provided to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work seamlessly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-7 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is smaller, but slightly higher. Honda CR-V is 17 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-7, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 524 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 774 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda CR-V has 69 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-7. The Mazda CX-7 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-7, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`160 | 2`430 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mazda CX-7 has
| |