Honda CR-V 2010 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V and Land Rover Freelander have the same engine power, but Honda CR-V torque is 70 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Honda CR-V consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 210 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda CR-V consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Honda CR-V has 4x4: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is identified (pressure is provided to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work seamlessly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Freelander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Freelander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2010 2.2 engine: The Honda N22B diesel is generally considered a successful and durable engine. Its main weak points are connected with the fuel system, emissions components, cold-weather operation, and several intake and exhaust-related parts.
One of the most frequent complaints concerns the injectors. Depending on the version, owners report problems with sensitive piezo injectors, while Bosch injectors themselves are usually ... More about Honda CR-V 2010 2.2 engine Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.74 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 524 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1532 litres | no data | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Land Rover Freelander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.5 metres more than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`160 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |