Honda CR-V 2010 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V 2010 engine produces 10 HP more power than Honda CR-V 2007, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Honda CR-V 2007. Despite the higher power, Honda CR-V 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V 2007 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V 2010 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V 2007, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V 2010 could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V 2010 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V 2007. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V 2007 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2010: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is identified (pressure is provided to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work seamlessly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. Honda CR-V 2007: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V 2007 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V 2010 and Honda CR-V 2007 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 524 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 955 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V 2007 has more luggage space. Honda CR-V 2010 has 32 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V 2007. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`160 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |