Honda CR-V 2010 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V 2010 engine produces 10 HP more power than Honda CR-V 2007, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Honda CR-V 2007. Despite the higher power, Honda CR-V 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V 2007 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V 2010 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V 2007, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V 2010 could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V 2010 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V 2007. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V 2007 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2010: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is identified (pressure is provided to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work seamlessly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. Honda CR-V 2006: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V 2007 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2010 2.2 engine: The Honda N22B diesel is generally considered a successful and durable engine. Its main weak points are connected with the fuel system, emissions components, cold-weather operation, and several intake and exhaust-related parts.
One of the most frequent complaints concerns the injectors. Depending on the version, owners report problems with sensitive piezo injectors, while Bosch injectors themselves are usually ... More about Honda CR-V 2010 2.2 engine Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V 2010 and Honda CR-V 2007 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 524 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1532 litres | 1532 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V 2007 has more luggage space. Honda CR-V 2010 has 32 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V 2007. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`160 kg | 2`160 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`773 kg | 1`617 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 387 kg | 543 kg | |
| Honda CR-V 2010 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 40 procentiem less than Honda CR-V 2007. Therefore, Honda CR-V 2007 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |