Honda CR-V 2010 vs Renault Koleos 2008
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 175 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 360 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
Renault Koleos is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 25 HP less power than Renault Koleos, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Renault Koleos. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
930 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
710 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Koleos gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 14 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Koleos might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Renault Koleos engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.53 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
Honda CR-V and Renault Koleos are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 524 litres | 450 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1380 litres | |
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V has 74 litres more trunk space than the Renault Koleos. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Koleos. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`160 | 2`250 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 8600 | 5800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Renault Koleos has
| |