Honda CR-V 2010 vs Renault Koleos 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Renault Koleos is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 25 HP less power than Renault Koleos, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Renault Koleos. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 6.4 | |
|
The Renault Koleos is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Renault Koleos gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Koleos might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Renault Koleos engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2010 2.2 engine: The Honda N22B diesel is generally considered a successful and durable engine. Its main weak points are connected with the fuel system, emissions components, cold-weather operation, and several intake and exhaust-related parts.
One of the most frequent complaints concerns the injectors. Depending on the version, owners report problems with sensitive piezo injectors, while Bosch injectors themselves are usually ... More about Honda CR-V 2010 2.2 engine Renault Koleos 2011 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V and Renault Koleos are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 524 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1532 litres | no data | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V has 74 litres more trunk space than the Renault Koleos. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Koleos. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`160 kg | 2`250 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`773 kg | 1`655 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 387 kg | 595 kg | |
| Honda CR-V load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 54 procentiem less than Renault Koleos. Therefore, Renault Koleos is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Renault Koleos has
| |