Honda CR-V 2010 vs Opel Antara 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 34 HP less power than Opel Antara, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Opel Antara. Despite less power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is smaller. Honda CR-V is 7 cm shorter than the Opel Antara, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 524 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1391 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda CR-V has 122 litres more trunk space than the Opel Antara. The Opel Antara may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.5 metres less than that of the Opel Antara, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`160 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Antara has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Opel Antara has
| |