Honda CR-V 2010 vs Jeep Compass 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 14 HP more power than Jeep Compass, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Jeep Compass. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Compass is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Honda CR-V has 4x4: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is identified (pressure is provided to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work seamlessly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Compass engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Compass engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 8 cm longer than the Jeep Compass, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda CR-V is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 524 litres | 328 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1269 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V has 196 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 1 metres more than that of the Jeep Compass, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`160 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |