Honda CR-V 2010 vs BMW X1 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
BMW X1 is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 27 HP less power than BMW X1, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
|
Honda CR-V has 4x4: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is identified (pressure is provided to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work seamlessly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X1 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW X1 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| BMW X1 2009 2.0 engine: The BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100 000 km. In addition, the engine has to be removed from the car to replace ... More about BMW X1 2009 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is larger. Honda CR-V is 7 cm longer than the BMW X1, 2 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 524 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1350 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V has 104 litres more trunk space than the BMW X1. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`160 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Honda CR-V has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for BMW X1, so Honda CR-V quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
BMW X1 has
| |