Honda CR-V 2010 vs Renault Koleos 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Honda CR-V) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Renault Koleos) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V and Renault Koleos have the same engine power, but Honda CR-V torque is 128 NM less than Renault Koleos. Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Koleos is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Koleos gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda Accord | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Renault Koleos engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2010 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2010 2.0 engine Renault Koleos 2011 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V and Renault Koleos are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 524 litres | 450 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V has 74 litres more trunk space than the Renault Koleos. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Koleos. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`080 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Renault Koleos has
| |