Honda CR-V 2010 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 169 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 19 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 41 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | no data | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Honda CR-V has 4x4: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is identified (pressure is provided to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work seamlessly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda Accord | Used also on Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2010 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 11 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 3 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 524 litres | 603 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Honda CR-V has 79 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`080 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |