Honda CR-V 2007 vs Renault Koleos 2008
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 166 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 220 NM | 226 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
Renault Koleos is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 4 HP less power than Renault Koleos, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Renault Koleos. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 9.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
The Renault Koleos is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda CR-V consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
780 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
540 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Koleos gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 18 years | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Koleos might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
Honda CR-V and Renault Koleos are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 556 litres | 450 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
955 litres | 1380 litres | |
Honda CR-V has 106 litres more trunk space than the Renault Koleos. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Koleos (by 425 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Koleos. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`160 | 2`150 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 5000 | 4800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Renault Koleos has
| |