Honda CR-V 2007 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 166 HP | 169 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 3 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 540 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2007: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. Nissan X-Trail 2007: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 11 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 556 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
955 litres | 1742 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Honda CR-V has 77 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 787 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 1 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`160 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 4600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |