Honda CR-V 2007 vs Land Rover Freelander 2007

 
Honda CR-V
2007 - 2010
Land Rover Freelander
2007 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.2 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain and belt

Performance

Power: 140 HP160 HP
Torque: 340 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.3 seconds11.7 seconds
Honda CR-V engine produces 20 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Despite less power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.57.5
Real fuel consumption: 7.3 l/100km8.5 l/100km
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Honda CR-V consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander.
Fuel tank capacity: 58 litres68 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 890 km in combined cycle900 km in combined cycle
790 km with real consumption800 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km560'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 8 years10 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-VInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Land Rover Freelander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ...  More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine 

Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ...  More about Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.50 m
Width: 1.82 m1.91 m
Height: 1.68 m1.74 m
Honda CR-V is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 556 litres755 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
955 litresno data
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Honda CR-V has 199 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. This could mean that the Honda CR-V uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.4 metres more than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1602`000
Safety:
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 50006200
Rating in user reviews: 8.8/10 7.4/10
Pros and Cons: Honda CR-V has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Land Rover Freelander has
  • more power
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv