Honda CR-V 2007 vs Land Rover Freelander 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 10 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander. Despite less power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.79 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 556 litres | 755 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
955 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Honda CR-V has 199 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. This could mean that the Honda CR-V uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres more than that of the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`160 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 6400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |