Honda CR-V 2007 vs Honda CR-V 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V 2007 engine produces 10 HP less power than Honda CR-V 2010, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Honda CR-V 2010. Despite less power, Honda CR-V 2007 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V 2007 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V 2007 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V 2010, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V 2007 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V 2007 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V 2010. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V 2007 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2007: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. Honda CR-V 2010: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is identified (pressure is provided to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work seamlessly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V 2007 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V 2007 and Honda CR-V 2010 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 556 litres | 524 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
955 litres | no data | |
|
Honda CR-V 2007 has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V 2007 has 32 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V 2010. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`160 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |