Honda CR-V 2007 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2007
Body: | Crossover / SUV | Crossover / SUV | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Honda CR-V and Volkswagen Tiguan have the same engine power, but Honda CR-V torque is 20 NM more than Volkswagen Tiguan. Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 7.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 64 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
1010 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
790 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 390'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Tiguan engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Tiguan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.43 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
Honda CR-V is 9 cm longer than the Volkswagen Tiguan, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 556 litres | 470 litres | |
Honda CR-V has 86 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`160 | 2`165 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | high | below average | |
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Tiguan has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 6800 | 8200 | |
|
|