Honda CR-V 2007 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 169 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 227 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda CR-V engine produces 29 HP less power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, but torque is 113 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Despite less power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 10.4 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 2 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 1 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 556 litres | 398 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
955 litres | no data | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V has 158 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.8 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`160 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Grand Vitara has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |