Honda CR-V 2007 vs Renault Koleos 2008
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
Honda CR-V engine produces 10 HP less power than Renault Koleos, but torque is 20 NM more than Renault Koleos. Despite less power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 7.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
1010 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
790 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 14 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Koleos might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Renault Koleos engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine Renault Koleos 2008 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
Honda CR-V and Renault Koleos are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 556 litres | 450 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
955 litres | 1380 litres | |
Honda CR-V has 106 litres more trunk space than the Renault Koleos. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Koleos (by 425 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Koleos. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`160 | 2`300 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 5000 | 5400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Renault Koleos has
| |