Honda CR-V 2007 vs Opel Antara 2007

 
Honda CR-V
2007 - 2010
Opel Antara
2007 - 2011
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 140 HP150 HP
Torque: 340 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.3 seconds12.1 seconds
Honda CR-V is more dynamic to drive.
Honda CR-V engine produces 10 HP less power than Opel Antara, but torque is 20 NM more than Opel Antara. Despite less power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.58.6
Real fuel consumption: 7.3 l/100km10.9 l/100km
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Honda CR-V consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 3.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara.
Fuel tank capacity: 58 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 890 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
790 km with real consumption590 km with real consumption
Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km530'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Antara engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 8 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-VInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Captiva, Chevrolet Epica, Chevrolet Cruze
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Opel Antara engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ...  More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.58 m
Width: 1.82 m1.85 m
Height: 1.68 m1.70 m
Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 6 cm shorter than the Opel Antara, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 556 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
955 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters12.4 meters
The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.6 metres less than that of the Opel Antara, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`160no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

below average
Honda CR-V has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Antara has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 50004600
Rating in user reviews: 8.8/10 7.4/10
Pros and Cons: Honda CR-V has
  • timing chain engine
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Opel Antara has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv