Honda CR-V 2007 vs Mercedes GLK 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Mercedes GLK is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 30 HP less power than Mercedes GLK, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Mercedes GLK. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GLK, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GLK. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes GLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Honda CR-V and Mercedes GLK are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 556 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
955 litres | 1550 litres | |
| Honda CR-V has 106 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes GLK. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes GLK (by 595 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mercedes GLK. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`160 kg | 2`500 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`617 kg | 1`805 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 543 kg | 695 kg | |
| Honda CR-V load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 28 procentiem less than Mercedes GLK. Therefore, Mercedes GLK is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes GLK has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mercedes GLK has
| |