Honda CR-V 2007 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 233 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 NM | 291 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 83 HP less power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 99 NM less than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 10.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 11.7 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Honda CR-V 2007 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 2 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 1 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 556 litres | 398 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
955 litres | no data | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V has 158 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.8 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Grand Vitara has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |