Honda CR-V 2007 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 NM | 176 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 14 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Despite the higher power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Honda CR-V consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda CR-V consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 46 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda Accord | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mitsubishi Outlander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2007 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.62 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 7 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 556 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1532 litres | 1705 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Mitsubishi Outlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 173 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`050 kg | 1`995 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`498 kg | 1`540 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 552 kg | 455 kg | |
| Honda CR-V load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Therefore, Honda CR-V is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 1800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |