Honda CR-V 2004 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 23 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Despite less power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 9.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.84 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 3 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Honda CR-V has 579 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Honda CR-V uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 1095 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 1.3 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`506 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |