Honda CR-V 2004 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 3.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 384 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 14 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V and Jeep Grand Cherokee have the same engine power, but Honda CR-V torque is 44 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 11.8 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 5.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 765 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.76 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 3 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Honda CR-V has 579 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Honda CR-V uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 1095 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`375 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee has serious deffects in 415 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |