Honda CR-V 2004 vs Land Rover Defender 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda CR-V engine produces 18 HP more power than Land Rover Defender, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Land Rover Defender. Thanks to more power Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 6.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 10.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 4.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Defender, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 615 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Defender. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Defender engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | Used also on Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 2.08 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 4 cm longer than the Land Rover Defender, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 37 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
952 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 2.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Defender, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 3`500 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 20 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Land Rover Defender has
| |