Honda CR-V 2004 vs Hyundai Tucson 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda CR-V engine produces 28 HP more power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 95 NM more than Hyundai Tucson. Thanks to more power Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Tucson might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai Tucson engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.73 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 32 cm longer than the Hyundai Tucson, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 644 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Honda CR-V has 119 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. This could mean that the Honda CR-V uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`210 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |