Honda CR-V 2004 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2006

 
Honda CR-V
2004 - 2006
Chevrolet Captiva
2006 - 2011
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 140 HP150 HP
Torque: 340 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 seconds10.6 seconds
Honda CR-V engine produces 10 HP less power than Chevrolet Captiva, but torque is 20 NM more than Chevrolet Captiva.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.77.4
Real fuel consumption: 7.5 l/100km9.0 l/100km
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva.
Fuel tank capacity: 58 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 860 km in combined cycle870 km in combined cycle
980 km on highway980 km on highway
770 km with real consumption720 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km530'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Captiva engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 8 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-VInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Antara, Chevrolet Epica, Chevrolet Cruze
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Chevrolet Captiva engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ...  More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.64 m
Width: 1.78 m1.85 m
Height: 1.71 m1.72 m
Honda CR-V and Chevrolet Captiva are practically the same length.
Seats: 5 seats7 seats
Trunk capacity: 525 litres465 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data465 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 525 litres465 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
952 litres930 litres
In 5-seat version Honda CR-V has more luggage space (by 60 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 22 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.9 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data2`505
Safety: no data
Quality:Chevrolet Captiva has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Chevrolet Captiva, so Chevrolet Captiva quality is probably better
Average price (€): 26004400
Pros and Cons: Honda CR-V has
  • timing chain engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Chevrolet Captiva has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv