Honda CR-V 2004 vs Nissan X-Trail 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 10 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 2 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Despite the higher power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Honda CR-V has 4x4: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Primera, Nissan Serena, Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is larger. Honda CR-V is 13 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 527 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 1841 litres | |
| Honda CR-V has 117 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 889 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 7.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
| |