Honda CR-V 2004 vs Mitsubishi L 200 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 50 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, but torque is 50 NM less than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 75 litres | |
| 540 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 30 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | Used also on Mitsubishi Pajero | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is larger. Honda CR-V is 14 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 13 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 2`835 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |